Why Marie Staunton, Harriet Harman, Jonathon King, P.I.E and other bleeding hearts are completely erroneous when it comes to Paedophiles

Seeing Jonathon King makes me feel sick. Enough to warrant a panic attack. These nauseating types have no idea what we're banging on about. They do not get it, they can't get it, they are wired differently. 

There are only two types of people. People who love and people who control. You are one or the other. Controllers never learn to bond and never learn the value of love. They can be very lovable people, gorgeous, kind and funny, sometimes witty and intelligent, the best - but they can't love. They cannot. It's sadly impossible for them. They cannot be lovers, they don't know how, they are sometimes maudlin, are NPD, they think sex - it's somehow beneath them. Really.

An NPD doesn't get it. We are talking about  r.e.s.p.e.c.t. Us ranty anti's - we are hysterical and mad god-bothering/loons to them. Only I'm not. I'm into science. I'm seriously into science. I am working on truly brilliant stuff here. Life changing amazing good stuff. And I don't - not for one second - agree that any child should be invaded by any adult, ever, any where, at any time, no matter what, ever. Since the dawn of time, this is the rule. Now. I know that some Freemasons believe that baby children should be abused 'once' to 'prevent them turning gay'. Nope. African tribes don't do it either (this is what Jamie's dad told me when he tried to persuade me to suck my baby's penis to 'stop him being gay' - he was deadly serious, he wasn't joking.  I wanted to smack him quite hard) It could explain the awful thing I saw once, a little girl apparently badly abused. By a really, really 'nice' man. Awful. These guys appear very calm, good, kind, very nice, vary caring, funny, back-slappy, vary 'blokey' very smart, Rolf Harrisy, clever, respectable, eminently sensible and very 'shrug the shoulders' very tearful (look at Holly and Jessica's killer, like that) and also - they excuse others on 'human' grounds. The fact that we've all done a bit of bad stuff. Not like this. Not like these guys do. Leave your judgments to the judge and stick to the letter of the law, if you want to be happy and do the right thing, children everywhere would appreciate it hero.

Well - if the Conservatives were honest (lol) they would all admit to their Adult Friend Finder and Craigslist activities, 98% of them are probably 'guilty' of this (bit of consenting adult fun/naked people are nothing new) and this is because they miss sex, as they have a habit of marrying their mother/image of.  They also get very bored. This leaves the Madonna Whore complex thing. They want the housework done and the gravy proper (big boobs clinch it, guys are jealous of the pals missus mammalian glands, it makes sense?). They use sex as a prop/diversion, a way to avoid the real issues, as an escape. They don't care who you are. Not much. Just the obvious bits. This leaves them horny and the wives betrayed, lied to and confused. The wives are either abused as kids or otherwise sex-haters (I only hated sex with Jamie's dad as he was a nutcase, controlling, stalker and violent, not a turn on, he once came to my new home and screamed through the door 'I can do it now [] taught me! Let me in! He was serious) for whatever reason. Usually lack of confidence. Those gals missed them Cosmopolitan issues and are usually NPD, this means they are far too special to understand human needs or emotion well. Some are too special to use the internet. Not kidding. The precious daughters of the infrequent and 'gentle' abusers will sport gorgeous guilt-Jewellery and ephemera from guilty-daddy and will defend the rights of gay kids as far as sexuality goes, but what about their other choices? A child can be gay without indulging in sex. The act of sex doesn't define 'gay'. Every kid has sexy feelings, this doesn't mean they should jump an old man or old bird. This is it. The kid has rights. The child will grow and THEN decide what he/she really wants. Sexual violation leaves trust trashed, and is mostly, extremely confusing if not traumatising. It messes up the natural respect you would otherwise nurture. It goes against all we are told about truth and trust. it distorts all reality to be betrayed by a parent/parental figure. That's why we have well-thought laws. Because - it isn't about YOU, Harriet Harman. It isn't about YOU Jonathan King. It isn't about YOU Rolf Harris. It's about little people who haven't yet gotten to the age where they can understand the entire issue well enough to indulge themselves in it. They don't understand it yet. It takes a while to know the implications. They may want to be religious. They may want to be hermits. They may want to be alone. They may want to be something that is not of your learning. They may be 'other'. They don't know the implications. They only know that their body is the only thing that is truly theirs, next to other 'identity'. I am qualified enough to write this stuff. Nobody owes you anything. Nobody on earth, unless it is someone who took your body when you didn't have your wits about you. In which case They owe you and always will. A theft like that, cannot be replaced, cannot be valued as your body is your own private domain - nobody is allowed to touch it without your express, informed, consent. Amen god/whoever.

How Royal is the Queen? Our fantastic pedigree bloodline is far purer according to our documents! Odd or what

Mother 4 Justice - also - tried to write to cousin Connie Mills reply and Facebook are gagging me!  'The (500 page) report is purely my father's Plantagenet line.

Royal Celts of England 

The Lucy clan were friends with the Robillard going back to 1066, William brought two knights bearing their names, with him for the huge battle 

De Lucye OR Lucy were based all over the Britain and Ireland but established a home at Charlecote circa 1100 (erroneous dates online must be ignored)  Elizabeth Lucye was the childof a noble family and a good catholic lady. Many awful lies are still circulated about the family line and this lady.

This is Lucye

There were witnesses to her actual marriage to Edward 1V. Many have died and suffered exposing the truth, now widely known and understood.

The children of the line, carry the DNA. DNA has the truth, even on death. I have no plan to die or to be cremated in any form !

 My mother's Lucy line is a bit of a mystery. The Lucy family are also traced back to Dunmow, Essex circa/approx 1030? Prior to that there are links to Robillard De Torce and the town of Lucy in France also (teeny village with white sandy beaches by the river, bit like Frensham Ponds - where I filmed with Jane Asher as a small child) - Facebook! >
Unable to post comment.

Hermes Justice Unable to post link?
1 min · Like
Hermes Justice Connie S Mills the report is purely my father's line.My mother's is a bit of a mystery. The Lucy family are traced back to Dunow Essex - later Lady Lucye DID marry Edward 1V - Thomas More knew all about it - they have trashed her name for centuries but she was a very good and noble woman and mother to two of his children (at least) - Edwards mother was DISTRAUGHT that wanted to DIVORCE her (not wed, they were married in a Catholic church!) - his line from her, are the true Royals of England - if you want to be purist!

Unable to post comment. 

Our emblems are interesting to say the least.  

The Lucy family crest  is 'three fish' (See origin of Holy Trinity and meaning of Triquetra (/traɪˈkwɛtrə/; Latin tri-"three" and quetrus "cornered")  and the Latin 'fish' name derives it's meaning from interesting things ! The Latin 'Vesica piscis' is also intriguing to note. 

Robillard's are varied and pictured. We have many Royal Kings as grandfathers, Pipin (Italian) also. We de original mob. Sicilian.