On this day of remembrance - ID cards would be welcomed here, as they are in Europe and in the USA - let's DEFEND - not fight

I think it was 2008-10 when I petitioned the governmentt to introduce ID cards- at the time, oddly,  Harriet Harman was the only one making any sense in this area - the cards would out paedophiles and criminals galore - let's help our police and other services today and introduce ID cards for residents of less than 8 years.

That way we can ID where the worst offenders are and detect what they've been up to. We need to do this 10 years ago - would have saved lives and helped everyone good.

Sadly - it only serves corruption and criminals not to have them at this time. Let's get them in overnight - and review them in four-five years - for the sake of YOUR security - let's say YES to ID (as the no's argument holds no water at all, not when implemented in this way)

  Number 10 are aware they are coveting criminals with their hedge funds and illegal spending - UKIP will put this right -

meantime, I sent this to Larry at LBC just now:

'Hi Larry, great show - ID cards- the government have removed my petition to introduce ID cards - from 2010 - my friend Marlene from California - was the only person to sign it - now - people would sign in droves - the thing is - people who have been resident here for over 8 years, need not carry a card - it is reason and logic - thanks, Liz Robillard'

Why Marie Staunton, Harriet Harman, Jonathon King, P.I.E and other bleeding hearts are completely erroneous when it comes to Paedophiles

Seeing Jonathon King makes me feel sick. Enough to warrant a panic attack. These nauseating types have no idea what we're banging on about. They do not get it, they can't get it, they are wired differently. 

There are only two types of people. People who love and people who control. You are one or the other. Controllers never learn to bond and never learn the value of love. They can be very lovable people, gorgeous, kind and funny, sometimes witty and intelligent, the best - but they can't love. They cannot. It's sadly impossible for them. They cannot be lovers, they don't know how, they are sometimes maudlin, are NPD, they think sex - it's somehow beneath them. Really.

An NPD doesn't get it. We are talking about  r.e.s.p.e.c.t. Us ranty anti's - we are hysterical and mad god-bothering/loons to them. Only I'm not. I'm into science. I'm seriously into science. I am working on truly brilliant stuff here. Life changing amazing good stuff. And I don't - not for one second - agree that any child should be invaded by any adult, ever, any where, at any time, no matter what, ever. Since the dawn of time, this is the rule. Now. I know that some Freemasons believe that baby children should be abused 'once' to 'prevent them turning gay'. Nope. African tribes don't do it either (this is what Jamie's dad told me when he tried to persuade me to suck my baby's penis to 'stop him being gay' - he was deadly serious, he wasn't joking.  I wanted to smack him quite hard) It could explain the awful thing I saw once, a little girl apparently badly abused. By a really, really 'nice' man. Awful. These guys appear very calm, good, kind, very nice, vary caring, funny, back-slappy, vary 'blokey' very smart, Rolf Harrisy, clever, respectable, eminently sensible and very 'shrug the shoulders' very tearful (look at Holly and Jessica's killer, like that) and also - they excuse others on 'human' grounds. The fact that we've all done a bit of bad stuff. Not like this. Not like these guys do. Leave your judgments to the judge and stick to the letter of the law, if you want to be happy and do the right thing, children everywhere would appreciate it hero.

Well - if the Conservatives were honest (lol) they would all admit to their Adult Friend Finder and Craigslist activities, 98% of them are probably 'guilty' of this (bit of consenting adult fun/naked people are nothing new) and this is because they miss sex, as they have a habit of marrying their mother/image of.  They also get very bored. This leaves the Madonna Whore complex thing. They want the housework done and the gravy proper (big boobs clinch it, guys are jealous of the pals missus mammalian glands, it makes sense?). They use sex as a prop/diversion, a way to avoid the real issues, as an escape. They don't care who you are. Not much. Just the obvious bits. This leaves them horny and the wives betrayed, lied to and confused. The wives are either abused as kids or otherwise sex-haters (I only hated sex with Jamie's dad as he was a nutcase, controlling, stalker and violent, not a turn on, he once came to my new home and screamed through the door 'I can do it now [] taught me! Let me in! He was serious) for whatever reason. Usually lack of confidence. Those gals missed them Cosmopolitan issues and are usually NPD, this means they are far too special to understand human needs or emotion well. Some are too special to use the internet. Not kidding. The precious daughters of the infrequent and 'gentle' abusers will sport gorgeous guilt-Jewellery and ephemera from guilty-daddy and will defend the rights of gay kids as far as sexuality goes, but what about their other choices? A child can be gay without indulging in sex. The act of sex doesn't define 'gay'. Every kid has sexy feelings, this doesn't mean they should jump an old man or old bird. This is it. The kid has rights. The child will grow and THEN decide what he/she really wants. Sexual violation leaves trust trashed, and is mostly, extremely confusing if not traumatising. It messes up the natural respect you would otherwise nurture. It goes against all we are told about truth and trust. it distorts all reality to be betrayed by a parent/parental figure. That's why we have well-thought laws. Because - it isn't about YOU, Harriet Harman. It isn't about YOU Jonathan King. It isn't about YOU Rolf Harris. It's about little people who haven't yet gotten to the age where they can understand the entire issue well enough to indulge themselves in it. They don't understand it yet. It takes a while to know the implications. They may want to be religious. They may want to be hermits. They may want to be alone. They may want to be something that is not of your learning. They may be 'other'. They don't know the implications. They only know that their body is the only thing that is truly theirs, next to other 'identity'. I am qualified enough to write this stuff. Nobody owes you anything. Nobody on earth, unless it is someone who took your body when you didn't have your wits about you. In which case They owe you and always will. A theft like that, cannot be replaced, cannot be valued as your body is your own private domain - nobody is allowed to touch it without your express, informed, consent. Amen god/whoever.