Clare’s Law: what is the ‘Right-to-Ask’ and what does it mean for you? By guest blogger Lucy Phipps - Marilyn Stowe Blog

Clare’s Law: what is the ‘Right-to-Ask’ and what does it mean for you? By guest blogger Lucy Phipps - Marilyn Stowe Blog

Mother 4 Justice - Elizabeth Robillard blogs and shares truth and information

RBKC - Notice of Legal Action - hope this is public enough for you?

Milne, Dominic

(CENTRAL AND NORTH WEST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST)


30/10/2014

NHS and RBKC
(social services dept)


Notice of Legal Action


Do Not Ignore


Legal action against the authority is underway and the solicitor will
be in contact in due course, please note that all correspondence will
be now recorded. and both copies of correspondence and audio
recordings will be used in evidence, for previous legal activity, see
Lucy V Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea 1997

I will be claiming for damages for

injury
loss
false allegations
maltreatment
misfeasance
negligence
human right's violations (not exhaustive)

See also 'Death of Natalie Thomas' video on Youtube and my previous
correspondence

Yours sincerely

E,C.Lucy aka E.C. Lucy Robillard
[snip]

The Times - how many employees are involved in CSA I wonder

From: Liz R (Account suspended)

16 May 2011

Dear Ministry of Justice,

Please willyou be kind enough to poit me in a direction where I can
access justice in regard to the content herein as follows? It is in
email format dated 2006, the circumstances are worse (attachments
on request)

Dear Miss Downes [HM Courts] & Sir Rifkind,

please file the letter (below this) and attachments - I do not have
email addresses for Harris Temperley or CAFCASS.

I am requesting a public inquiry,

Dear Malcolm Rifkind,

I am writing to request you call for a public inquiry into the care
order that affects my son, Jamie Jones, and myself.
It's been a campaign of hate and cover-ups, conspiracy to pervert
justice, and as Mr.Simon Tyler (a friend and director of [mencap]
Equal People KC ) said to me 'it is [case against me] completely
criminal';

This case against myself has been brought, in my belief, to
cover-up peadophilic crimes against my son, whom is mute and
vulnerable, and I am continued to be villified due to the criminal
withlding of information, conspiracy and perjury of social workers
and CAFCASS involved.

Even to date, outrageous claims such as 'Jamie is still unable to
form a stool [age 13] ' by the current social worker. Erika
Endlien, makes it obvious that there is a major problem there.

I never had preconceived ideas as to what was wrong with my sons
tummy, he often appears to be in discomfort/pain and is widely
reported he 'grabs at' and 'clutches' his guts, and does not 'form
stools' the consistency of stools are not normal, this was
considered to be (after much investigation and endoscopy) to be
inflammatory bowel disease by consultants at the Royal Free
Hospital (2000) or the cause 'behavioural', by CAFCASS and social
workers (current) .

The gut problem I can NOW see from looking at records, coincides
with Jamie beginning attending the Little House Respite Care
facility, and the social worker Tim O'Neill becoming involved, and
from there him building a case against me I believe to cover his
own guilt of attacking my son sexually, I believe my sons' gut
problem to be the direct cause of sexual abuse from this man.

I am requesting a public inquiry and a public police inquiry into
all available evidence .

I wish to inform the police and others of facts:

1. Attached self explanatory letters (sent separately in this
instance via website 'write to them'

2. The social services were aware of how vulnerable we were, Tim
O'Neill specifically
was written to on 6th March 2001 (three months before my sons'
removal)
my GP wrote ''..I have today been in touch with Tim O'Neill to let
him know Miss Lucy may need increased support for Miss Lucy at this
time (see letter attached) there followed an assessment with Anne
marie-Wilson and Lettie Blythe (RBKC social workers) in April 2001.
The outcome of the assessment was kept away from the courts, vital
evidence that the social services were well aware of our extreme
circumstances of that time. Despite the fact that BY LAW at that
time, as a carer and as a disabled mother of a disabled child, we
were entitled to a an *implemented care-plan* - we had NO CARE
PLAN.
The result, in my view is *neglect of duty of care* on behalf of
social services being to blame for the situation I found myself on
June 10th 2001. Also kept from the courts were my exchanges with
complaints manager Jane Dykins, where I had requested Mr.O'Neill be
arrested for causing me 'actual bodily harm' by knowingly causing
me added stress by calling me constantly and providing terrible
services which he knew I had to complain of (eg sending different
carers each week to take my son to the park, these carers had no
police checks, were unqualified and could have been anyone, I
refused to allow my son to go with these strangers)

Another time a former RBKC social worker was provided to supply
overnight respite when I specifically requested NO overnight
respite but was refused (by Mr.O'Neill) ALL respite unless I
complied with overnight respite- I had to cancel it as Jamie had
reportedly attacked the former social worker (and my son is an
extremely placid and biddable boy, in my opinion incapable of
attacking anyone) - in short, this whole order began with the
criminal intent of Mr.O'Neill to sabotage myself and my parenting
in order to have access to and continue to abuse my child.

I am being 'eugenically' ordered to have (unquantified) 'therapy' I
believe this violates my human rights.
I have agreed to do anything at all to comply with social services
- it is well recorded. I can't agree to more than 'anything at
all'.

Instead they determine to continue to violate our rights by not
allowing us a family life, by not adhering to the original
judgement in any event (please see LSC letter attached *) - I do
not believe I have had a fair hearing since having to represent
myself, I am unwell and I have been forced to be a
litigant-in-person due to being entirely unable to secure the
services of a solicitor despite repeated attempts to secure
assistance from the law society, Resolution (family law solicitors)
etc etc.

Recently my parenting was applauded in a letter to me from social
worker Erika Endlein, who though lied about my flat being a bit of
a mess 'with toys and papers' - I have to remind her I have film of
her visit, and confirm my flat is often untidy, I call the British
public to answer if this is a crime that should deprive me of my
child?

Bearing in mind these facts and also the laws regarding the
acquisition of an EPO and it's legality at the time (taken without
informing me, me having voluntarily called police and social
services on june 10th 2001 for HELP and if it and it's rider
attched (police statement on application of EPO) be looked at you
will see it's contradictions also. In fact my son was placed in
VOLUNTARY CARE, and EPO was *entirely* unecessary and yet another
tool used to vilify me, Mr.O'Neill, again, was the instigator of
the unnecessary EPO (emergency protection order').

At no stage ever was I given a chance of rehabilitation, assistance
or support.

No effort AT ALL was made to keep my family together, I was at the
time (according to my GP) 'acutely grieving [my] mothers death' see
letter attached * (consequently had two years counselling with
CRUSE' bereavement care)

Major lies and evidence (such as the extent of my ex husbands'
[very] criminal activity and violence especially) were kept from Judge
Moorehouse and subsequent judges, that I had not the wherewithal to
place the evidence, [snip]
to be able to represent myself is in fact a violation of natural
laws, disability and human rights laws.

I hereby request a public inquiry into this ongoing case (where
even social services own solicitor admitted to me to withholding
evidence) the evidence I have requested you look at and that my son
be returned to my care forthwith,

Yours sincerely,

[trim]

Liz R

Link to this

Liz R (Account suspended) left an annotation (16 May 2011)

I have been asked to 'forget' my own son, these people are criminals.

Link to this

From: Data Access & Compliance Unit
Ministry of Justice

17 May 2011

Dear Ms R,

As explained in previous responses the content of the e-mail below is
not requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act and as
such we are unable to deal with them.

However, in your correspondence below you ask to be pointed towards
someone who will assist you access justice. Please accept my apologies
that I am unable to assist with this matter. You may however wish to
contact your local citizens advice bureau or police force for advice.

Please accept my apologies that I could not be of more assistance.

Best Wishes
Kate

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Liz R (Account suspended)

24 May 2011

Dear Data Access & Compliance Unit,

Kate- with the local authority 'owning' (so refusing) the CAB and
all other charities in the area my son has NO VOICE And neither do
I - we cannot get leggal assistance in this regard, it's causign a
lot of horror. I hold the leader of the council responsible for
any/all harm that has happened to my son since 1991, before he was
born (due to medical facts posted in files online that will be
released in due course) to date. That's on record. They are
behaving criminally at RBKC, no matter what it looks like, they
have committed horrific crimes. They know what they've done.

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

From: chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk
To: aswrota@rbkc.gov.uk
Subject: RE:
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:57:20 +0100

tell me where my son is and we will talk, okay?

From: chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk
To: aswrota@rbkc.gov.uk
Subject: RE:
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:56:48 +0100

tell me where my son is and we will talk, okay?

From: chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk
To: aswrota@rbkc.gov.uk
Subject:
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:52:47 +0100

Dear Mr.Holden

thank you so much for your vist/s and letter, the

sentiment is appreicated indeed, I do not use a

wheelchair and am fighting very hard to stay out of

one.

If this about wanting to get me out of my home, you will be dealing with armed forces of whom I have many friends whom are willing to die for me (and you if you remain loyal to British values). They are lovely people and no, I am not moving for anyone or anything, all cons are very tiresome to me, seen them all. I am a behaviorist. Thanks. Where is my son?

I found the courier whom delivered your letter had

pushed over my room-divider, it was regarded as an act

of violence and one I have come to know from RBKC

staff. Due to the lies and violent hatred and

injustice, the kidnap of my son. the withholding of

medical help, and the blocking of services and the lack

of access to justice, I have to ask you to go ahead and

make a court order to indtrude in my life, I have no

wish to be forced to endure more hate from RBKC and

simply wish for some peace, it's is my view it is not

too much to ask that I have apology and respite from

sheer torture of which your department,is clearly very

guilty.
In short, I am not avaiable for any visits ever, unless

a judge orders it, and would only respond to aplogy,

compensation and a lot more respect/lack of torture,

RBKC is in violation of all known law, I refuse to

entertain draconian action against a lone person doing

her best to protect the freedoms of the British against

a tyranny of greed, perversion and drugs from RBKC

management.

I find any unsolicited communication from RBKC a violation of liberty and offensively anti-British.

I still maintain I could run RBKC for free, part-time, from my death-bed, if asked, and I gaurantee there would be no complaints. *Note to management - end the crookery, end the cons, it's all noted.

Kind regards

Yours sincerely

E.C.Lucy AKA E.C.Robillard
296a
sw5 9ba

Assange post just vanished, expect he's cavorting about with Salsa bending Ecuadorian maids or something

Went  like this 'Julian Assange Prosecutors in Sweden felt the hearing was unnecessary part of a Assange's appeal is to request a hearing. Given the that has elapsed,  the punishment and inconsistencies with the law...the hand of justice should grant Assange's appeal and allow oral hearing with transcripts to serve as written evidence.   Otherwise, ' and then vamoosh. I guess Jules could request a audio link or reason why not. I had one for a family law case during 2001, 16 days long. Huge waste of taxpayers money. Billions go to waste in the secret courts, easy money for the Laveyan/bent -lawyer. It's international law after all. And you can never trust a lawyer unless he's a President of the USA and, no matter how close they are - business is business. We had luck doing it arselfz in 1997 - see Lucy V Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea - not the case but the points of law that made it a Landmark ruling, legal history (not that you'd want to know about local Royal heroics or anything. (from winning - we now have CBT as part of mainstream psychiatry, didn't do too bad) So Jules, you could do worse than taking that advice old bean. Telephone link. If you're found guilty, sentencing to be done when you decide to leave the embassy.  

Nothing wrong with the law , it's the implementation

it's the corruption of the law and the non implementation of the law you need to focus on, there is nothing wrong with law itself

Even the Legal Ombudsman fears the control freaks - and they wonder why the world protests at the corruption?

 AND there was never an allocated worker. Corrupt? Yep

Thank you for your email.

Please note that we  are a separate organisation to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and have no influence over their decisions or processes.

Yours sincerely

Assessment Centre

Legal Ombudsman

Telephone: 0300 555 0333

www.legalombudsman.org.uk

From: Robillard]
Sent: 10 May 2011 18:38
To: Christian Paterson
Cc: SNIP
Subject: RE: Your enquiry: reference 201013366

10th May 2011

REF; 201013366 Anne Lehane, SRA non-action

Further to letters from the SRA months ago, they have still not allocated a worker to this case, please advise?

Yours sincerely

E.C.Lucy
sw5 9ba

---

From: Christian.Paterson@Legalombudsman.org.uk
To: chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Your enquiry: reference 201013366
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:59:07 +0000

Dear Ms Lucy

Thank you for your email.

The Legal Ombudsman investigates complaints into the service that someone has received from their lawyer.

We have attached a leaflet on how we can assist, and also a complaint form so that you can articulate the details of your complaint.

Before we can formally investigate a complaint, we require that the person bringing the complaint formally complains to the lawyer in writing and then allows them up to eight weeks to respond to it. We have also attached a template complaint letter if you require assistance with this.

Please be aware that there are two relevant time limits: the '12 month rule' and the '6 month rule'. Generally speaking, your complaint should be brought to us no later than 12 months from when the problem occurred or from when you should reasonably have become aware of the problem. Suppose the problem occurred, or you became aware of the problem, at the end of March 2010. You should bring your complaint to us before the end of March 2011.

Plus, you should come to us within 6 months of receiving a final response from your lawyer after complaining to them. Suppose you complained to your lawyer about the problem at the end of June 2010 and they responded with a final offer to sort things out in the middle of August last year. You're still not happy with what they offered. You would have until the middle of February this year (2011) to bring your complaint to us.

We would suggest that you contact our assessment centre on 0300 555 0333 where an assessor will be able to provide you with advice and assistance regarding your complaint.

If we do not hear from you within seven days, we will presume that you no longer wish to pursue with your complaint and will close your case.

Yours sincerely

Assessment Centre

Legal Ombudsman

Telephone: 0300 555 0333

www.legalombudsman.org.uk

From: Miss Ec Lucy [mailto:chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk]
Sent: 14 February 2011 08:44
To: Enquiries
Subject: FW: Anne Lehane - Solicitor Complaint

---

From: chelsea.finest@hotmail.co.uk

Subject: RE: Anne Lehane - Solicitor Complaint
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:36:35 +0000

SRA
RE Anne Lehane, Slctr R.B.K.C
Feb. 14th  2011


x 4 attachments


Dear Madam /Sir


Further to my requests for time-limits [] and your code-of practice:


Mss Lehane knowingly submitted false evidence in court to Judge Moorehouse during care proceedings.
She also omitted to inform the judge that by law, despite my being disabled (also with severe back problem (still) and grieving my mother, dead in the February of that year)  that my son nor I had no care plan despite a care-pan assessment in the April of 2001, Lettie Bluthe and Anne-Marie Wilson were the social workers. She ommited the fact I had complained to Jane Dykins of GBH by the SSD due to cosntant hrassments, lies and threats, denied in court.  The law then stated that care-pans should be implemented within 40 days.

Anne Lehane had had access to previous records (Matrimonial proceedings ending in March 1999, Kingston + Wandsworth Courts, Judge Walker Smith ++) Case Ref 92D 1089-

Just a year prior to the care-proceedings (where I had called social services emergency line all night and had had no response at all, so called police, thus placing my son in care voluntarily- a a police protection order was made- despite my home had been disgusting it was clean two days later- IGNORED by RBKC) Sean Ryan, our then social worker at RBKC and others, supported my parenting in 1999. In 2001 and 2002 onwards Miss Lehane knowingly kept evidence that could have changed the outcome of the case.  She kept evidence from the court of Autism expert, Prof.Eric Fombonne who had visited in the custody/RO/contact hearing, only to bring in yet another expert as she had allowed a social worker, Anne-Marie Wilson, to write what culminated in character assassination of me, with a falsified document, that was hearsay at best, in this document the social worker claimed I had self-diagnosed my own agoraphobia (my first treatment of it by the council, was in 1973, I had been agoraphobic in varying degrees my entire life and Miss Lehane and others knew it well, they had had access to all my records, although since then, I have had an apology from  KC PCT (Patricia Wright) as my records were mixed in with other patients,


Miss Lehane also claimed via this 'evidence' from Anne Marie Wilson (SW), also claimed I had diagnosed my son with a gut-problem and autism when she knew this was done by Simon Murch and I hadn't even been present, plus nobody had given consent - see a snip from my sister attached)  Miss Lehane had full knowledge that I had represented myself with lay-barrister Peter Bibby in 1996-7 at a SENDIST Tribunal and that due to that my son had seen quite a few consultant professionals (including NHS expert Dr.Hilary Cass) regarding diagnosis (he is SLD/Autism) my son had been statemented since 1995 (?) approx and regualry seen by local Ed.Pysch, Patsy Wagner and also including prominent experts such as Svien Eikeseth, Glenn Sallows and Esther Shaffer (R.I.P) -who's report was also left out of the care-proceedings that James did have some words- Miss Lehane is apparently covering up the fact my son ever spoke and although he didn't have fluent language he could speak a little and had was showing huge promise- she failed to inform the judge in the care proceedings of the mental problems and suicide attempts of the father and that the father is a drink-rive recidivist, had cheated benefits and tax, Hadn't paid court fees not any Child Maintenance in eight and half years (still outstanding) had been to prison for drug dealing, and had frequent hallucinations he is 'the devil'. LAC reviews were never legally abided by, I was never represented and was refused telephone links- as for the hearing- the care proceedings- I had access to only one and half days of the hearing , the rest was heard without my having access due to the video equipment having broken down, that violated article 6- despite Gordon Murdoch QC and Malcolm Chisholm representing me, I did not have a chance to intervene where I could have and let the judge know what was going on- Miss Lehane knowingly wasted public money on expert reports when she already had full access to many expert reports- via a tribunal I was running a home education at the time after having won the land-mark ruling ( see Luvy V RBKC) - there was no need for any expert reports. Miss Lehane also allowed evidence to claim I had diagnosed my son with a 'gut problem' when I wasn't even present at that diagnosis - my sister was present, Dr.Murch - a child-gastroenetolgist diagnosed my son wit the 'outlawed' LNH 4 and had sent me pictures of it- he had been my GP, Dr. Kate O'Briens'- next door neighbour- that GP had then tried to help us discover why my son was clutching at his tummy. I also had had a report from the Priory clinic regarding my agoraphobia and good character that she also had access to, she had reports from local experts and doctors , plus evidence that social workers had been 'pre-planning' to take Jamie into care as Jamie had been seen by Dr, Murch (apparently this means 'munchausens syndrome by proxy') that evidence was omitted from the court- a total mystery-  yet she and local solicitors and the barristers colluded to waste taxpayers money and take my child - as it was- Judge Moorehouse made the attached recommendation - that my relationship to my son was 'too important' not to have 'unsupervised overnight contact' but due to pure malice- Miss Lehalne advised social workers to reduce my contact with my son and has knowingly left my son at risk with his very violent and dangerous father- who sadly also has/had custody of a his daughter, Maxine, when a child, Cosmo Steele, already died in his care aged just four. the child was claimed to have died of cot-death and heart-disease. I had been 'suffocated' with a pillow by Mr.Jones (the father) and had to fight for my life, attempted murder charges should have been brought. Cosmo was found asphyxiated. I know from the previous (documented) violence I had suffered, and known about by Miss Lehane, these children are left at risk with him. I have suffered much malice and violations of much law due to the advice that stops at the hand of Miss Lehane, who has always blamed social workers - saying it her being directed by them, specifically by Brett Taylor. I do not believe that to be the complete  case, I believe she has deliberately mislead some social workers I  believe there should be a public inquiry, the case went on for something like ten days and I HAD ACCESS to TWO of those days- There is more I will follow up with when able. Thank you for your time

Yours sincerely
SNIP

2014 - still no justice - Son still missing - god knows what's happened to him RBKC

From: Liz R (Account suspended)
16 May 2011
Dear Ministry of Justice,
Please willyou be kind enough to poit me in a direction where I can
access justice in regard to the content herein as follows? It is in
email format dated 2006, the circumstances are worse (attachments
on request)
Dear Miss Downes [HM Courts] & Sir Rifkind,
please file the letter (below this) and attachments - I do not have
email addresses for Harris Temperley or CAFCASS.
I am requesting a public inquiry,
Dear Malcolm Rifkind,
I am writing to request you call for a public inquiry into the care
order that affects my son, Jamie Jones, and myself.
It's been a campaign of hate and cover-ups, conspiracy to pervert
justice, and as Mr.Simon Tyler (a friend and director of [mencap]
Equal People KC ) said to me 'it is [case against me] completely
criminal';
This case against myself has been brought, in my belief, to
cover-up peadophilic crimes against my son, whom is mute and
vulnerable, and I am continued to be villified due to the criminal
withlding of information, conspiracy and perjury of social workers
and CAFCASS involved. READ MORE