Damaging spin created by 'ABA' - awful 'new' diagnoses were being invented ad hoc - 'bolting' was used to desribe abused children running away - My darling boy Jamie is so brave - he couldn't reason with words, so he ran - and ran and swam and swam and he's still out there trying - I love you baby - you hold on - mummy is here and I will see you soon my angel I LOVE YOU

FAO Children with Disabilities Team
 23/09/10
 Isaac Newton Professional Development Cent
 108A Lancaster Road Town/City LONDON County/State gtr London Postcode/Zip W11 1QS Country United Kingdom SOCIAL SERVICES CWDT + Treehouse Trust Behavioural Unit + Redcliffe Surgery W8 7NX FAO Erika Endlein/Peter Woodhead/Michele Harrison OCTOBER 15TH 2010 VIA EMAIL FOR BREVITY AND HARD COPY The local authority currently have no legal responsibility over my son, there is no order that prevents me being my sons' parent, if there was I would have it changed. I have 100 % Legal Parental Responsibility for my child and have had since he was born.. The argument at present is a 'no contact recommended by social services' order which to which I chose not to contest on the last occasion the LA made an application to court- I did not contest it for reasons that will be revealed in due course. Meanwhile I would appreciate your desisting from unilaterally altering law and to begin upholding LAC law as on numerous points on several occasions, you failed to do so , all of which is recorded of which you may be aware. That said I have no wish to be bad friends with Fay Wright/any social worker/doctor (unless they have harmed my son!) and would like to know who ordered her to slam the 'phone down on me upon hearing my name as does my sons school now? Who gave that directive please? I apologise for being harsh with the school but was shocked to hear Jamie is running away so often and his running away being termed 'bolting' - he is a person not a horse, he is running away and I believe I know why. In my view ABA is a crime against my son and Jamie has too much crime in his life as it is being forced to live wih aviolent, addicted, criminal recidivist is not the ideal for Jamie in my view, neither is having to live without his mum. My poor lad is too terrified to speak now but I guarantee you this will change and that he will be cared for whether I am available or not and will sue etc, especially if things are not put right for him and for me. The School too are not acting within the law by not keeping me updated and not caring for my son as required by law. I have every right to protest against the way that my son remains in nappies, apparently in pain and mute/non-verbal and running away frequently from school and teachers- despite literally millions of pounds spent on his 'ABA' education thanks to the taxpayer. I have every right to complain that Jamie can speak and has spoken and that he is being kept mute for your purposes that will be revealed one day by Jamie and he will also hold you responsible for the horrific way you have all treated his mother. If I were you now, I would ensure contact for Jamie and I increases without delay. Jamie can listen to me, and I can hold his attention for up to 50- minutes at a time, he never runs away when I'm speaking to him. I think anyone would find that a pivotal point to consider. I would appreciate it if you would appreciate these points I've made, try to understand them as best you can and I will return to this matter in due course, meanwhile I request to know that if Jamie needs anything at all, to contact me and let me know without delay please, thank you. Yours sincerely E.C.LUCY 296A SW5 9BA CC. Treehouse Trust, Haven Respite Care Unit, SSD W8 7NX, SEN DEPT, W8 7NX, SENDIST, Simon Tyler.