Showing posts with label child. Show all posts
Showing posts with label child. Show all posts

9 Nov 2014

Alcohol causing brain damage - why was this not dealt with?


A child was born severely brain-damaged  because the mother was neckin a bottle of vodka a day - why was this allowed? Where was her social worker? Where was the doctor? I had 2 glasses of wine on my birthday when I was pregnant and I never forgave myself - also smoked two fags a day - doctors said 'it could be more harmful to stop smoking than to carry on' was worried about withdrawals and distressing a baby already being 'attacked' by violent, unwanted sex - horrible - but poor little mites - what inhabits the minds of these nutters to think it's OK to torture an innocent like this?  Why why why...


The independent wrote

'However, two leading women’s charities have warned that it could set a legal precedent to prosecute women who drink while pregnant.
Lawyers acting for the council seek to prove that the child’s birth mother’s excessive drinking was a violent crime that should be recognised under the Government’s Criminal Injuries Compensation scheme, which awards compensation to people hurt by a violent crime'- meanwhile...................


Andrew Peterson, a 21-year-old Special Olympian born with fetal alcohol syndrome, was a finalist for for a cover contest. See Runner’s World on his Facebook page called “Andrew Peterson Goes for the Gold.”
21-year-old Special Olympian born with fetal alcohol syndrome, as a finalist for its cover contest. Peterson announced his finalist position in Runner’s World on his Facebook page called “Andrew Peterson Goes for the Gold. Andrew is a Special Olympian born with fetal alcohol syndrome, as a finalist for its cover contest. Peterson announced his finalist position in Runner’s World on his Facebook page called “Andrew Peterson Goes for the Gold.”

13 Oct 2014

This is my dead brother - life destroyed by Psychiatry and Raping Laveyans



Another reason the world's illuminated are collaborating on the software that will convict  at least 88% of all crime. Change came. Get used to it.

I am making his life mean more than it did. Brian is pictured, centre. rest in peace my lovely big brother, how I love and and miss you darling. Forgive me for not being there enough, I was being hounded by the Conservative psychopaths who were busy destroying my child and myself..


19 Sep 2014

Why world? Why are you hurting US?!

For the CSA inquiry - I don't care anymore about anyone but my son.

Why world? Why are you hurting US?! How would you feel, your son raped and kidnapped and abused in every way - for many years, and nobody cares, nobody cares - my poor darling - I know the truth baby - and those evil freaks will pay one day - we have to get you safe somehow - people are blind, they are stupid, blind and afraid - but Jamie - mummy knows what's happened to you my poor baby boy . I am so sorry - my poor angel - and all these cunts - these 'phoenix victim' type cunts clearly don't even know the first thing about suffering - they haven't touched what you have been through my poor little angel - How I hate the evil - my poor Jamie, god help you and me - and the world that is so fucking ugly

How would you feel, your son raped and kidnapped and abused in every way - for many, MANY years, kidnapped and held against his will - and nobody cares, nobody ever cares - my poor darling - I know the truth baby - and those evil freaks will pay one heavily day - we have to get you safe somehow - people are blind, they are stupid, blind and afraid - but Jamie - mummy knows what's happened to you my baby boy -  I am so sorry - my poor angel - and all these c*nts - these 'Phoenix survivor' hero types don't even know what suffering REALLY IS - they haven't touched what you have been through and they do not care at all - my poor little angel - How I hate the evil - my poor Jamie, god help you and me - and the world that is so fking ugly from Toronto to South Africa, to the Daily Mail - I had entire relationships with people to protect myself from the psychopath - I had sex with  men to protect both of us in any way I could  - I wanted to tell them what happened but it was too big to handle - too big to articulate and too big for anyone to understand - the horror is too big - a child died, child died and I know that the psycho is guilty - and my son is horribly abused and hurt and harmed - why oh why why why won't someone help? WHY? why WHY?!!!!!!!!!!!!

Am I a narcisssist for not wanting my son heavily abused and hurt? What was this sir Malcolm, Scotch flippin' mist? Where's my lad? WHERE is my son!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mother 4 Justice - Elizabeth Robillard blogs and shares truth and information




Malcolm
Rifkind MP





E.C.Lucy - Robillard


Tuesday 11 October 2005

Dear Malcolm Rifkind,

first I'd like to offer my sincere commiserations at stepping down from
the leadership challenge, I am deeply sorry for the feelings it must
have invoked in you.

Please, when you have the time, would you read through my previous
correspondence and be kind enough to reply and to help us?

I would have liked to have met you (*Earls Court Square) but
I am housebound.

I would appreciate your time deeply, the main points being, my son is
living with a crack-cocaine abuser, a known child abuser and a benefit
fraudster as well as a woman-beater, all this is documented, so why my
son isn't living with me is a mystery to anyone with common sense, RBKC
social services are culpable for any harm coming to my son.

Thank you again.

Yours sincerely,
 []

London Councils - reminder - meh meh meh


From: Liz R (Account suspended)

23 June 2011

Dear London Councils,

Do you have any policy/recorded information on how much councils
are allowed to spend on private legal
services/barristers/solicitors brought in privately or is it at the
discretion of the legal department involved?

I'm asking due to RBKC's legal department paying 10k per day (TEN
THOUSAND POUNDS PER DAY) for a QC to oppose an unrepresented
DISABLED parent when the parent was at a tribunal to win her child
an electronic communications device worth over one hundred pounds
(as well as try to remove her child from what she considered an
abusive institution) - she still won the device but sadly the
schools (Jigsaw and Treehouse) refused to use it and the child
remained without it (why would a special needs school like that,
want to stop or prevent a child from speaking or communicating
supported by rbkc SEN Dept?)

RBKC also sent it's entire Special Needs Department heads to oppose
this unrepresented disabled mother who was attempting to gain a
communication device for her child) as well as all the head staff
of the schools attending.

Why would they want to stop a child from speaking?

Anyway - do you have any policy/information on the spending
of privately paid Legal Services by London Councils, what is the
policy or is there one, that regulates spending/over-spending by
local councils for outside legal services please?

Ten thousand pounds per day for a private barrister seems
excessive.

Also, do you have any policy for London Councils/ RBKC regarding
'bringing the council into disrepute' policy/training/information?

Some feel that management at RBKC particularly would rather maim
residents than allow rbkc to have complaints filed or justice done
in favour of a resident with a valid complaint? It does seem that
the council need to appear to be right NO MATTER WHAT, and wondered
where this inhuman, horrific abuse comes from?

Yours faithfully,

Liz R

Link to this
From: FOI-DPA Complaints
London Councils

27 June 2011

Dear Ms R

Thank you for your request for information regarding on how much councils are required to spend on private legal services/barristers/solicitors.

Your request has now been considered, but I regret that London Councils does not hold any information in respect of the above request.

You also asked 'do you have any policy for London Councils/ RBKC regarding 'bringing the council into disrepute' policy/training/information?

This request has also been considered but I regret that London Councils does not hold any information in respect of this request either.

London Councils is not a local authority but rather a body which represents the 33 London boroughs. London Councils does not have its own code of conduct for Members. Members are bound by their respective local authority's Members' code of conduct while acting as a representative of their authority on any London Councils Member Body. We do have a Code of Conduct for our Officers but it does not apply to the Officers working for Kensington and Chelsea.

These requests for information are about policies which, where they are in place, are approved by individual Councils so you will need to refer your request to the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.

If you have any queries or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me.

If you wish to make a complaint about the way we have handled your enquiry under the Freedom of Information Act, please make your complaint in writing to Christiane Jenkins, Director, Corporate Governance, London Councils, 59½ Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL or email [email address].

Regards,

Emily Salinger

Emily Salinger
Project Manager, Business Planning & Performance
Corporate Governance Division
London Councils
59½ Southwark Street
London, SE1 0AL
Tel: 020 7934 9836
Fax: 020 7934 9665
Website: www.londoncouncils.gov.uk
London Councils is committed to fighting for more resources for London and getting the best possible deal for London's 33 councils. We lobby government and others, develop policy and run a range of services designed to make life better for Londoners.

show quoted sections

Link to this
From: Liz R (Account suspended)

27 June 2011

Dear FOI-DPA Complaints,

Thanks, before you go, please clarify which parts of which 'Code of
Conduct for Officers' does not apply to Kensington and Chelsea or
RBKC and which departments does it not apply to and which
legislation says that such a Code of Practice should not apply to
one (is it just rbkc or are there other councils the Code of
Practice 'doesn't apply to'? Why doesn't apply? If it doesn't apply
to rbkc, why does it apply to other councils?) - specific council,
in this case, RBKC?

'We do have a Code of Conduct for our Officers but it does not
apply to the Officers working for Kensington and Chelsea.' Why not?

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Link to this
From: FOI-DPA Complaints
London Councils

27 June 2011

Dear Ms R,

We have a Code of Conduct which is an internal policy which applies to London Councils staff. London Councils is a membership organisation which all the London Boroughs belong to but it employs its own staff and has its own terms and conditions of employment. London Councils does not develop Human Resources procedures which apply to individual Boroughs.

I apologise if this distinction was not clear before.

Kensington and Chelsea may have a Code of Conduct which applies to their Officers and/or Members but we do not hold that information.

Please feel free to contact me again if you need further clarification.

Regards,

Emily Salinger

show quoted sections

Link to this
From: Liz R (Account suspended)

27 June 2011

Dear FOI-DPA Complaints,

Thank you, just one point I'd appreciate you to clarify please? Are
you confirming there's no cap on spending for legal services in any
council but there is at 'London Councils'?

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Link to this
From: FOI-DPA Complaints
London Councils

28 June 2011

Dear Ms R

Thank you for your e-mail. To answer your question below please note that no information is held in respect of the request for a policy or information regarding expenditure on "private legal services/barristers/solicitors" both for London Councils and other local authorities in London. I hope this answers your question.

If you have any queries or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me.

If you wish to make a complaint about the way we have handled your enquiry under the Freedom of Information Act, please make your complaint in writing to Christiane Jenkins, Director, Corporate Governance, London Councils, 59½ Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL or email [email address].

Many thanks

Sylvia Edohasim
Corporate Complaints and Freedom of Information Officer

show quoted sections

Link to this
From: Liz R (Account suspended)

29 June 2011

Dear FOI-DPA Complaints,

Thanks.

I interpret that answer as a 'yes, there is no cap on legal
spending in any London Council' if you are OK with that
interpretation, I can leave it there? Thanks.

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Link to this
From: FOI-DPA Complaints
London Councils

30 June 2011

Dear Liz

For us London Councils there is no cap. This may differ though for other boroughs, it will be best then if you asked the particular borough directly.

I hope this helps.

Many thanks
Sylvia

Sylvia Edohasim
Corporate Complaints and Freedom of Information Officer

show quoted sections

Link to this
From: Liz R (Account suspended)

30 June 2011

Dear FOI-DPA Complaints,

Thank you Sylvia, best to all,

Yours sincerely,

Liz R

Link to this
Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
Download a zip file of all correspondence
Liz R (Account suspended) only:
Write a reply
Update the status of this request
Request an internal review
London Councils only:
Respond to request
Follow this request

There is 1 person following this request

Follow
RSS icon RSS feed of updates
Offensive? Unsuitable?

Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid for FOI purposes (read more).

If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators

Report this request
Act on what you've learnt

Tweet this request
 Wordpress Start your own blog
 Get help investigating
 Write to your politician
 Pledge with others
Similar requests

Information on personal budgets
To London Councils by Lucy Series 7 September 2011

Bonus payments paid by grade
To London Councils by Jeremy Ginnerly 27 December 2011

Freedom Pass
To London Councils by Mr T Chipperfield 14 August 2012

Cost of the PATAS service
To Parking and Traffic Appeals Service by matthew smart 15 May 2012

Structure Charts & Consultancy Spend
To London Councils by C. Swann 19 September 2012

Staff at The Haven Respite Care Unit run by RBKC staff?
To Hammersmith and Fulham Borough Council by Liz R (Account suspended) 4 February 2010

Support for BME Employees
To London Councils by C E Bradshaw 18 August 2011

Freedom Pass for all from age 60 - When, How, How Much?
To London Councils by Michael Douglas 13 June 2012

Members of London Council giving Evidence at trial of Malcolm Webster
To London Councils by LS Palmer (Account suspended) 22 July 2011

PATAS Statistics - Removed Vehicles
To London Councils by Mr. O'Brien 30 July 2012

More similar requests

Event history details

1 Sep 2014

Gone to UKIP and the PM Miscarriage of Justice - poor baby boy - more agony from the evil that is NLP shit - sent to UKIP just now

'  Received: by 10.224.72.138 with SMTP id m10csp748902qaj; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:57:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.59.18 with SMTP id v18mr37240847wjq.64.1409630251828; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <donotreply@number10.gov.uk> Received: fromDelivered-To: XXXXXes17@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.72.138 with SMTP id m10csp748902qaj; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:57:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.59.18 with SMTP id v18mr37240847wjq.64.1409630251828; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <donotreply@number10.gov.uk> Received: from mail.number10.gov.uk (mail.number10.gov.uk. [62.172.97.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id an8si3906054wjc.168.2014.09.01.20.57.31 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: donotreply@number10.gov.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=62.172.97.229; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: donotreply@number10.gov.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=donotreply@number10.gov.uk Message-Id: <201409020408.s8248IjZ026222@mail.number10.gov.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: donotreply@number10.gov.uk To: 17hermes17@gmail.com Date: 2 Sep 2014 05:08:37 +0100 Subject: Your message to Number 10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p>Thank you for your message. Please confirm the message by clicking on= the following link: https://email.number10.gov.uk/VerifyMessage.aspx?id=3D926b3e66-d576-407f-b3ad-374ee5751e50= =0D=0A</p>=0D=0ABy confirming this e-mail, you give permission for this= office to forward your e-mail to the appropriate Government Department.= =0D=0A=0D=0APlease note - this is an automated e-mail. Please do not reply= to this e-mail address as your message will not be read. mail.number10.gov.uk (mail.number10.gov.uk. [62.172.97.229]) Date: 2 Sep 2014 05:08:37 +0100 Subject: Your message to Number 10'
 
 <SNIPPED>

Tuesday 2 September 2014

Dear Gerard Batten

I'm sorry to disturb you but I feel the Hampshite Police may be
supporting domestic terrorism  that may prove a gigantic threat to our
national security due to the mindset that has removed a terrified and
cancerous child from glaringly loving parents.

There is no sense detectable, in removing a frightened child in pain
from his parents and siblings. It smacks of extreme sadism, not seen to
this degree since RBKC conspired to take my son Jamie from me in 2001.

It's a miscarriage of justice before it's begun and a grave shame on
our justice system.

 Here are the signs of emotional abuse:

'Emotional Abuse Signs - 5 Significant Subtle Signs of Emotional Abuse

By Dr. Jeanne King, Ph.D.

Lack of "emotional safety" is the number one indicator of a potentially
dangerous relationship. It may seem subtle, yet it is ever so
significant with respect to your well-being.

When you have emotional safety, it's palatable. You can feel it in
every fiber of your being. When it's missing, you may feel its loss.
Or, you may simply know of it not being there by the presence of these
five glaring signs.

1) Not honoring your privacy If something is in a drawer, it's in a
drawer away from public display. Someone having no business in that
drawer may be drawn to explore its contents. And further, this
uninvited explorer may take issue with what is discovered. Beware of
these signs of emotional abuse.

2) Not respecting your boundaries If you say "no," will it be the end
of a discussion or the beginning of a negotiation? When "no" means
"maybe" and becomes a challenge to convert into a "yes," beware of
emotional abuse! You may be enticed to surrender your initial
preferences simply to divert the consequences of your failure to
comply.

3) Not appreciating your experience and/or your feelings If your inner
world is not noticed, or factored into decisions involving both of you,
beware of this non-empathic partner. Your inner world may interest him
or her when and only when, it serves their needs. Having an interest in
your experience merely because it's an expression of you is not to be
expected with an emotional abuser.

4) Not being willing to have mutual involvement in your interests
Mutual involvement doesn't mean equal time doing your interests verses
theirs. Rather, it is reciprocal "interest" (or acceptance) in that
which interests you. The emotional abuser does not show an interest (or
awareness, understanding, or involvement) in your interests because
these activities or things please you. Instead, he or she shows an
interest only as it serves him/her.

5) Not honoring you for who and what you are. Intentionally seeking to
alter who and what you are to suit one's own preferences, rather than
accepting you as you are, is the most glaring of these signs. (Be
mindful of the distinction between someone's efforts to alter you to
suit their needs verses offering constructive criticism to contribute
to your growth.) The emotional abuser will seek to mold you to become
who and what he/she desires.

While each one of these undermines emotional safety, in combination
they make it impossible. If you encounter this cluster of signs, you
are probably looking at an emotionally abusive relationship. Seek to
understand the constellation of symptoms defining intimate partner
abuse before the emotional abuse spirals out of control.

For more information about recognizing and ending emotional and verbal
abuse, see Emotional Verbal Abuse. Dr. Jeanne King, Ph.D. helps people
recognize, end, and heal from verbal emotional abuse.
www.PreventAbusiveRelationships.com

Jeanne King, Ph.D. - Domestic Abuse Prevention and Intervention'

I'm concerned that our Police have been very badly trained indeed and
rather than gaining seniority through merit, have managed it purely on
fear mongering due to flawed NLP training, for far, far too long (see
Bandler article in 'Mother Jones') as one ex police friend said 'we
have to work the job of three to fight the monsters within'

Yours sincerely,

Elizabeth Lucye Robillard